jonah_the_blunt (jonah_the_blunt) wrote in cranversations,
jonah_the_blunt
jonah_the_blunt
cranversations

a question of capitalism

A friend of mine told an interviewer for a job that he thought the pay was low compared to the same position at other companies in the area and that the benefits were shootty too in comparison. My question is which argument is more valid...a person should be paid more because of what the competative rate is or a person should be paid more because thats what their skills are worth?

What would you say if you were the interviewer?
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
  • 3 comments